Just a reminder about the false threat to "freedom of religion" conservatives are now claiming, since the Iowa Supreme Court decision. (If you think there's not a lot of money being spent, check out HRC's website:
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/04/national-organization-for-marriage-creates-fake-ad-for-fake-problems/.)


In fact, gay marriage poses no more threat to religions which preach homosexuality is a sin than civil divorce impinges on the Catholic doctrine which forbids it. Freedom of religion cannot include the freedom to impose your religious beliefs on other. It allows discrimination only within the faith, not against "non-believers."

You can keep me out of your Church, but not your hospital or the hall you rent for profit to the public. You can hire only Catholics in good standing with the Church to work in your school, office, hospital, which would, of course exclude any married homosexuals from CT, but if you employ any people who are not Catholic, you cannot only discriminate against qualified homosexuals, married or not.

You can't take all patients except homosexuals, accept all students except the children of homosexuals, or allow all people to have a marriage in your hall except for homosexuals.

You can't send your children to public school and prevent them from hearing teachers say that gay marriage is legal in CT, MA, and VT. You have plenty of home schooling and religious school options if you want them to follow your religion instead of secular law -- or science.

Don’t assume that misleading ads and silly talk-show media won’t really affect the way people vote. While religious freedom crosses all state borders in America, my civil right stop outside my region of New England.